When love for one's own child collides head-on with the right a community must keep, what does a mother choose? The instinct to protect one's own blood is the strongest of all — but if even that love cannot be an exception to the right, how heavy is the price of that choice?
THE QUESTION THE FILM ASKS
Using love for my own blood as the reason, am I carving out an exception to the right I ought to keep?
THE CLASSIC'S ANSWER · ORIGINAL
niyataṁ kuru karma tvaṁ karma jyāyo hy akarmaṇaḥ
📜 THE CLASSIC'S ANSWER
Do the duty allotted to you; action is better than inaction.
💡 TL;DR
The old teacher of the Gita said to do the duty allotted to you, however painful.
📝The Classic Answers
The old teacher of the Gita said to do the duty allotted to you, however painful. For a mother, love for her child is the strongest instinct, yet when the right a community must keep collides head-on with that love, she stands before the heaviest choice. That even love cannot be an exception to the right is severe, yet that choice is precisely a justice beyond the private. When the wish to protect my own would carve out an exception to the right, I choose not to evade that heavy portion.
— ONGO · Curator
🌱Apply It Today
If a moment tempted you to make an exception to the right because 'it's my own,' ask whether that exception is truly just.
📖 Classic Source:
Bhagavad Gītā 3:8.
Ancient text in the public domain; rendered and interpreted independently by ONGO.
The film is honored as an equal questioner; its plot is rendered only as a universal dilemma. The classic source is an ancient text (Public Domain), and the reflection is 100% original ONGO content.
✦
A Bridge Between Eras — the wisdoms this question threads
Reading the new through the old — classics this question awakens.
