DAY 243

Does a Dog Have It? — "No"

Record of Zhaozhou / Wumenguan Case 1 — "A Dog Has No Buddha-Nature"
9세기 당(唐), 1228년 무문관 결집
ORIGINAL
狗子無佛性 無
📜 THE VERSE

"Does even a dog have buddha-nature?" Zhaozhou answered with a single word: "No (Mu)."

❓ TODAY'S QUESTION

Could the very question that splits things into "yes / no" be the thing blocking the answer?

📝Reflection

This single word "Mu (No)" is a koan that countless practitioners have wrestled with for a lifetime over a thousand years. Though taught that all beings have buddha-nature, when asked whether a dog has it, Zhaozhou said "No." It seems a contradiction. But the heart of this koan is not in guessing "yes or no." Rather it aims at our very habit of splitting the world into being and non-being, right and wrong, self and other. Zhaozhou's "Mu" is a blade thrown into the net of that dualism. The instant you reach to pick an answer, you are already caught. What we learn before this koan is not the correct answer but the act of setting down, once, the mind that halves everything into two. Only within that letting-go does "Mu" quietly show itself.

— ONGO · Curator

🌱Apply It Today

When you move to judge something "good/bad" instantly today, hold the verdict for a moment. That brief gap of just looking, without halving it in two, is the doorway to this koan.

📖 Source: Record of Zhaozhou / Wumenguan Case 1 — "A Dog Has No Buddha-Nature". 9세기 어록·1228년 공안집 한문 원문 — 완전 Public Domain. 번역·해석 100% ONGO 오리지널..
This verse is read as universal humanistic wisdom, not religion — no faith is promoted, and the reflection is 100% original ONGO content.

Threads woven through this verse

← View all verses